Find grant reviewers beyond your usual network.
Describe the expertise your panel needs. Get researchers with the right domain knowledge, methodological background, and career seniority.
3 free searches — discover 60-150 matching professionals, no signup required
Then $1 per search
Not sure where to start? Try these.
You need a materials scientist with polymer nanocomposites experience who also understands computational modeling at the mesoscale. Your internal database returns three names. Two have conflicts. The third reviewed for you last cycle and declined. The panel meets in six weeks.
Scientific review officers who consistently assemble strong panels don't just search broader. They search differently. They look for researchers whose work spans the exact disciplinary intersection a proposal requires, not researchers who happen to be indexed under the right broad category. The difference matters most for interdisciplinary programs where traditional database categories break down completely.
Describe the exact combination of expertise your panel needs in scientific terms. CloneICP returns 20-50 researchers whose published work, institutional positions, and research trajectories match that description. Surface early-career scientists, researchers at non-R1 institutions, and experts outside your usual network. Apply your standard COI screening to a much larger starting pool.
Bigger pool. Fewer conflicts. Stronger panels.
What You Get
What You'll Get
Every search returns clear output in under 60 seconds.
20-50 Qualified Reviewers
Researchers with the domain expertise, methodological background, and career seniority appropriate for panel service.
Match Scores
Each candidate ranked by how closely their expertise matches the specific scientific area your panel needs to cover.
Why They Match
See specific signals: research focus, methodological expertise, institutional affiliation, publication trajectory.
CSV Export
Download your candidate list. Cross-reference with COI records and existing panel composition.
How It Works
Describe Your Target
Tell us who you're looking for in plain language.
AI Finds Matches
We analyze signals and find matching professionals.
Export Results
Up to 50 matches, ready for your enrichment tool.
How This Is Different
You know the challenge. Here's what changes.
- Internal databases recycle the same overburdened reviewers
- Conference attendee lists skew toward a narrow network
- Difficult to find reviewers for interdisciplinary proposals
- Panel diversity suffers when candidates come from the same professional circles
- Describe the exact expertise gap on your panel in scientific terms
- Find qualified researchers at institutions outside your usual network
- Surface early-career scientists with the right training and focus
- Build more representative panels from a broader candidate set
Questions